Auto-Claude is amazing, but unusable due to Claude AI infuriating usage limit

profile picture

Auto-Claude is amazing, but unusable due to Claude AI infuriating usage limit

Auto-Claude is amazing, but unusable due to Claude AI infuriating usage limit

I really wanted to love Auto-Claude.

On paper, it’s exactly the kind of tool I enjoy using: an app that lets you orchestrate multiple Claude sub-agents, each working independently, on their own tasks, their own branches, their own context. Parallel thinking. Parallel execution. Less babysitting.

If you’ve ever tried it, you know the idea is brilliant.

And that’s exactly why this is so frustrating.


Auto-Claude: the good stuff

Auto-Claude (https://github.com/AndyMik90/Auto-Claude) is a smart layer on top of Claude that lets you:

  • Spawn multiple sub-agents
  • Assign each agent a specific task
  • Let them work independently
  • Keep their outputs isolated (branches, context, responsibilities)

This is how AI agents should be used.

Not one giant chat doing everything badly, but many focused agents doing one thing well.

When it works, it feels like the future.


Then reality hits: Claude’s usage limits

Here’s the problem: Claude’s usage limits completely destroy the experience.

Even with a Claude PRO subscription, a single non-trivial task in Auto-Claude is enough to:

  • Instantly nuke your usage quota
  • Lock you out for 5 hours
  • Make the whole agent-based workflow pointless

One task. One agent. And you’re done for the next five hours.

And the task wasn't even finished !!

At that point, what’s the point of having multiple agents? WHAT'S THE POINT OF PAYING A PRO SUBSCRIPTION ?!!!!


Agent workflows and hard limits do not mix

Agent-based tools like Auto-Claude are designed to automatically iterate, explore, refine, retry.

They are token-hungry by nature.

Putting ultra-aggressive rate limits on top of that is like selling a sports car that shuts down after 10 minutes and asks you to come back later.

Yes, Claude is good. Yes, the outputs are often solid.

But the limitation is abusive.

It breaks the core promise of agentic workflows.


Claude is good, but this is not sustainable

Let me be clear: this isn’t a “Claude is bad” post.

Claude is actually quite good. Sometimes very good.

But with limits this strict, it becomes unusable for serious agent-based tools like Auto-Claude.

Even with PRO.

Especially with PRO, actually — because expectations are higher.

This is insane to me. Why am I paying.


Final thoughts

Auto-Claude is amazing.

The architecture makes sense. The workflow makes sense. The idea is absolutely right.

But Claude’s current usage limits make it a non-starter.

Until those limits are significantly relaxed (or at least made compatible with agent-based usage), Auto-Claude remains:

A glimpse of the future, locked behind an infuriating quota wall.

And that’s a real shame.

ai
claude
auto-claude
agents

about me

profile picture

I consider myself as an IT Business Artisan. Or Consultant CTO. I'm a self-taught Web Developper, coach and teacher. My main work is helping and guiding digital startups.

more about me

follow me

newsletter

A weekly email with the latests articles

support my work

Start trading on binance
  • BTC

    BTC

    bc1qgw9a8hyqqwvcls9ln7vhql4mad0qkveutr2td7

  • ETH

    ETH

    0x3A720717Da03dB6f3c4a4Ff08BC64100205A79d0

2026 © My Dynamic Production SRL All rights Reserved.